Communications Authority bans live broadcast of countrywide protests

Director General of the Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) David Mugonyi.

Photo credit: File | Nation Media Group

The Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) has ordered all television and radio stations to stop broadcasting live coverage of the ongoing anti-government protests taking place across the country. 

This move has been condemned by the Kenya Editors Guild (KEG), who have termed it a gross violation of the Constitution and of press freedom.

This directive comes amid escalating demonstrations by young people across the country, marking the first anniversary of last year’s Gen Z protests, which expressed discontent over economic policies and governance issues. 

Protests have been reported in at least 20 counties, including the cities of Nairobi, Mombasa, Nakuru and Kisumu.

“The live coverage of the June 25th, 2025 demonstrations are contrary to Articles 33(2) and 34(1) of Constitution of Kenya and Section 46I of the Kenya Information and Communications Act, 1998.

“This is therefore to direct all television and radio stations to stop any live coverage of the demonstrations forthwith. Failure to abide by this directive will result in regulatory action as stipulated in the Kenya Information and Communications Act 1998,” CA director-general David Mugonyi said.

The CA’s action effectively restricts real-time public access to visual and audio coverage of the protests, limiting the dissemination of the unfolding events.

“CA’s claim that it is acting under Articles 33 and 34 of the Constitution is legally and factually flawed. These provisions protect free expression, with clear limits only on hate speech, incitement, and propaganda—not on responsible journalism. Live, factual reporting by licensed media is not a threat—it’s a civic duty,” KEG said in a statement on Wednesday.

Article 33(2) states that: “The right to freedom of expression does not extend to— (a) propaganda for war; (b) incitement to violence; (c) hate speech; or (d) advocacy of hatred that— (i) constitutes ethnic incitement, vilification of others or incitement to cause harm; or (ii) is based on any ground of discrimination.”

Article 34(1) states: “Freedom and independence of electronic, print and all other types of media is guaranteed, but does not extend to any expression specified in Article 33 (2).”

Section 46I of the KICA Act states that, among others things, “All licensed broadcasters shall (a) provide responsible and responsive programming that caters for the varied needs and susceptibilities of different sections of the Kenyan community;

“(e) when controversial or contentious issues of public interest are discussed, make reasonable efforts to present alternative points of view, either in the same programme or in other programmes within the period of current interest.”

According to the editors’ lobby, the CA directive defies a 2023 High Court ruling that restrained the regulator from interfering with live media broadcasts. 

“This is not just a policy misstep; it’s a deliberate assault on media independence and judicial authority,” said KEG president Zubeidah Kananu. “Live, accurate reporting is not a threat to peace — it is a pillar of democracy.”

The guild has demanded the immediate withdrawal of the directive and urged Parliament and Judiciary to investigate the CA’s defiance of court orders.

KEG has also called on media outlets to stand firm, report responsibly and seek legal recourse where necessary.

PAYE Tax Calculator

Note: The results are not exact but very close to the actual.