Time flies with great content! Renew in to keep enjoying all our premium content.
Dynamic pricing: Balancing equity and the bottomline
The success of dynamic pricing in the years ahead will not be measured solely by revenue maximisation but by its ability to balance the bottom line with social responsibility.
One use case has taken flight from the shadows of airline booking systems to become ubiquitous in most digital marketplaces - dynamic pricing.
While insiders tout it as a triumph of market efficiency, the growing awareness of this practice among consumers has sparked a complex dialogue about its implications for market fairness and social equity.
As someone who has spent years pricing for various technology-inclined services, I have observed how dynamic pricing has evolved from a sophisticated tool used by large corporations to an essential strategy for businesses of all sizes.
The democratisation of this technology through SaaS platforms has leveled the playing field, making it possible for even small businesses to optimise their revenues in real time.
However, it has also introduced new challenges in consumer trust and market stability.
The recent backlash against surge pricing in ride-hailing services across Southeast Asia and Latin America illustrates the delicate balance between market efficiency and social acceptance.
When a ride's price can double during a rainstorm, or when battery is running low, or simply using a particular brand of phone from a pre-identified locale, we must ask: Are we optimising for market efficiency at the expense of social good?
The telecommunications sector provides another telling example. In markets like India, Nigeria and even Kenya, where mobile connectivity is often the primary internet access point, dynamic pricing of data plans has become both a tool for network management and a source of consumer frustration.
Charging premium rates during peak hours or location of access may optimise network resources, but it risks deepening the digital divide.
Looking ahead, the future of dynamic pricing lies in finding the sweet spot between algorithmic efficiency and human values. Companies must move beyond simple supply-demand calculations to consider social impact and long-term customer relationships.
This means developing pricing algorithms that factor in community needs, economic disparities, and essential service accessibility.
For businesses, the path forward involves greater transparency and consumer education. Customers are more likely to accept dynamic pricing when they understand the factors driving price changes and perceive the system as fair.
Companies should consider implementing price caps during emergencies, offering loyalty programmes that stabilise pricing, and ensuring essential services remain accessible to vulnerable populations.
As we advance into an increasingly automated future, the conversation around dynamic pricing must evolve from a debate about its merits to a more nuanced discussion about responsible implementation.
This is particularly crucial in emerging markets, where price fluctuations can be more severe due to lower average incomes and less robust social safety nets.
The success of dynamic pricing in the years ahead will not be measured solely by revenue maximisation but by its ability to balance the bottom line with social responsibility.
As technology advances, we must ensure that the invisible hand of algorithmic bias does not push essential goods and services out of reach for those who need them most or penalise consumers based on existential factors not entirely in their control.
